Quantifying Integrity.Strengthening Markets.Enabling Innovation.

WICS transforms financial product integrity from reactive, all-or-nothing approaches into a measurable, transparent, and rules-based framework that connects quantitative risk assessment with predetermined financial controls and settlement methodologies.

What is WICS?
A proprietary quantitative financial integrity-control system.
What problem does it solve?
The need to assess and manage susceptibility to manipulation while strengthening the integrity of financial products and settlements.
What makes it different?
It integrates quantitative integrity measurement, predetermined controls, and graduated financial adjustment mechanisms directly into financial product design and settlement.

Quantitative integrity assessment · Predetermined financial controls · Transparent settlement methodologies

U.S. Patent Pending

From integrity measurement to financial settlement

WICS solves the problem of how to measure, manage, and financially account for manipulation risk and anomalous activity in event-driven financial contracts using transparent, predetermined, and proportional integrity controls.

The challenge

Financial innovation requires measurable integrity.

As markets expand into prediction markets, event contracts and novel indices, products increasingly depend on outcomes that are harder to validate, and that may be influenced by individual participants, concentrated groups or external sources.

Traditional instruments rest on established markets and independently verifiable reference values. Many new ones do not. That raises questions every product designer, exchange and participant should be able to answer.

  1. How susceptible is an underlying event or variable to manipulation?
  2. Can the outcome be influenced by participants with an economic interest in the contract?
  3. How reliable and independently verifiable is the underlying data?
  4. What happens when unusual activity materially affects an observed outcome?
  5. Can settlement account for anomalous conditions without automatically canceling the contract?
  6. How can exchanges demonstrate that integrity risks were considered during product development?
  7. How can participants understand potential adjustments before entering a contract?
A critical distinction

An event may be accurately reported while the activity that produced it was influenced or manipulated. Accurate reporting of an outcome does not, by itself, establish the integrity of the underlying event.

The central questionHow do we measure, manage, and financially account for integrity risks in a consistent, transparent, and predetermined manner?

The problem WICS solves

Core Principle 3 is a standing obligation. The tools for meeting it are reactive.

Under CFTC Designated Contract Market Core Principle 3, an exchange may list only contracts that are not readily susceptible to manipulation. As markets list contracts on events, statistics and data that participants can influence, that obligation becomes harder to meet, and the operational tools for meeting it have not kept pace.

The regulatory problem

Showing that a contract is not readily susceptible to manipulation

Exchanges must evaluate susceptibility before listing and keep managing it for as long as a contract trades. For event-driven products there is often no standard, quantitative way to measure it, document it, or show how it is controlled.

The operational problem

Controls that act after the fact

When an outcome is anomalous or possibly manipulated, the response is typically post hoc: an investigation, a discretionary determination and a binary result.

  • Accept the observed outcome
  • Open a post-event investigation
  • Substitute an alternative reference value
  • Cancel, void or settle by fallback
Today: post hocWICS: ex ante, across the lifecycle
When controls are definedAfter the eventBefore the contract trades
How susceptibility is assessedQualitatively, case by caseQuantitatively, with weighted integrity scores
When integrity is measuredAt or after settlementFrom design through listing, trading and settlement
Response to an anomalyAccept or cancelPredetermined, graduated adjustment
What participants knowDiscovered after the factDisclosed before trading begins
The problem

Reactive, inconsistent and binary

Prediction markets and event-based financial contracts increasingly rely on outcomes that may be susceptible to manipulation or anomalous activity. Existing settlement approaches can be reactive, inconsistent, and binary, creating uncertainty for exchanges and market participants.

The solution

Predetermined and graduated

WICS provides a proprietary, quantitative integrity-control framework that evaluates susceptibility to manipulation and applies predetermined, graduated adjustments to financial indices and settlement values when specified integrity thresholds are triggered.

The benefit

Transparent and resilient

WICS helps exchanges and financial product developers design more transparent, resilient, and predictable financial contracts while strengthening market integrity and supporting regulatory compliance.

How a DCM lists a sports event contract today1

Exchanges certify their own contracts as manipulation-resistant, with no shared test.

  1. 1

    Exchange drafts it

    It picks the data source, settlement terms and surveillance on its own.

  2. 2

    Exchange self-certifies

    It certifies under Rule 40.2 that the contract meets the CEA.

  3. 3

    Contract starts trading

    Listing can follow one business day after filing, with no CFTC approval first.

Where the gap is

No uniform event-contract test: The CFTC requires each DCM to determine whether a contract is “not readily susceptible to manipulation,” but has not prescribed a single event-contract-specific methodology for making that determination.

No standardized evidentiary framework: Rule 40.2 and Appendix C require explanation, analysis and supporting evidence, but DCMs may apply different analyses and controls to similar event contracts.

Regulatory exposure remains: An inadequate certification can be stayed, withdrawn and resubmitted, and a false certification can trigger Commission proceedings or enforcement.

Self-certification places the initial compliance judgment with each DCM; the CFTC has not established a uniform event-contract methodology that makes those judgments analytically consistent.

1. Source: CFTC Regulation 40.2 (listing products by certification); CFTC Staff Advisory 26-08, DCMs and Event Contracts (12 Mar 2026); CFTC Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on prediction markets (Mar 2026).

CFTC enforcement, prediction markets, 2026

2026 enforcement cases target the same two risks: people who control the outcome, and insiders.

Feb 25, 2026

Enforcement advisory

Both risks

The Division of Enforcement cited real cases of a trader influencing an outcome and another trading on material nonpublic information. Insider-trading, fraud and manipulation rules apply, and DCMs must run their own surveillance and enforce their rules.

Jul 31, 2026

Santos order

Controller of the outcome

The CFTC alleged George Santos traded on whether he would attend the State of the Union while making public statements about his plans that moved prices in his favor.

Aug 28, 2026

Perez order

Insider information

The CFTC charged a White House teleprompter operator with using advance knowledge of presidential remarks to trade mention-market contracts.

These are the risks WICS scores before settlement: how much one actor controls each input, and who is close enough to the event to know or shape it first.

Charges are allegations. Source: CFTC Division of Enforcement Prediction Markets Advisory (25 Feb 2026); CFTC orders re: G. Santos (31 Jul 2026) and G. Perez (28 Aug 2026).

Sports betting integrity, 2025

Suspicious-betting alerts rose 29% in 2025 as US handle reached $167B.

The controls exchange filings cite are already standard in sports betting. Manipulation still gets through.

$166.9B1

US commercial sports betting handle in 2025, up 11% on 2024

3002

suspicious-betting alerts reported worldwide in 2025, up from 232 in 2024

542

matches proven corrupted in 2025 from operator betting data

Monitoring is catching more every year. It still runs beside settlement, so an alert cannot stop a bet that has already paid.

1. American Gaming Association, Commercial Gaming Revenue Tracker, full-year 2025 (Feb 2026).
2. International Betting Integrity Association, 2025 Sports Betting Integrity Report (3 Feb 2026).

The gap in today's filings

Filings assert integrity. They rarely demonstrate it.

Event-contract self-certifications typically cite the controls an exchange already has. What they seldom show is how those controls address the event itself: who can influence it, how, and what happens at settlement if they do.

Core Principle 3

Asserts manipulation resistance; doesn't demonstrate it

Filings cite

Objective data, position limits, KYC, surveillance, collateral and compliance review.

Not shown

Who can influence the outcome, how manipulation could occur, why the settlement source resists it, and how the contract design mitigates those risks.

What WICS adds

A quantitative, documented answer to each of those questions before listing: controllability of the outcome, reliability of the settlement source, and the design controls that address the risks.

Core Principle 4

Watches the trading, not the event

Filings cite

Platform surveillance for wash trading, spoofing and front-running, plus position limits, alerts, audit trails, halts and discipline.

Not shown

How those controls catch manipulation of the event or settlement itself, including an official result reported accurately but influenced, and how they fit each contract.

What WICS adds

Integrity gates and data validation applied to the event and settlement data, contract by contract, so an accurately reported but influenced result can be identified and handled under predetermined rules.

Core Principle 12

General rules, not product-specific protection

Filings cite

General prohibitions, surveillance, investigations and disciplinary procedures.

Not shown

How participants are protected from insider access, participant control of the event, restricted persons and informational advantages in each product.

What WICS adds

A contract-by-contract assessment of who could hold insider access, influence the event or hold an informational advantage, with the treatment of qualifying integrity events disclosed before trading.

The regulatory gap

Filings describe general exchange compliance but don't connect it to each contract's manipulation, settlement and participant-protection risks: the contract-specific "how and why" the CFTC now expects in a Part 40 filing.

WICS is designed to supply that connection, product by product.

The combined offer

A measurable, automated way to show, and enforce, that a contract is not readily susceptible to manipulation.

Core method

An index and settlement process with integrity built in.

Extended to every kind of event contract, plus what exchanges and regulators need to rely on it:

  1. 01

    Objective calibration

    Baselines and thresholds set by formula from objective data, not by discretionary judgment.

  2. 02

    Controls for binary contracts

    Predetermined integrity gates and rule-based responses for single-outcome event contracts.

  3. 03

    Contract design tools

    Susceptibility and controllability assessment to test and strengthen a contract before listing.

  4. 04

    Collateral and marking rules

    Margin and settlement marks derived from a mechanical formula, not from the market being settled.

  5. 05

    Automatically generated compliance record

    Assessments, triggers and calculations documented as the contract runs, ready for review and filings.

Where the integrity check sits

Today's integrity checks sit outside settlement. WICS puts the gate inside it.

TodayAlert after payout
  1. Official data feed
  2. Odds or index
  3. Settle on every venue
  4. Integrity alert arrives
  5. Reverse or void payouts
With WICSGate before payout
  1. Signed, multi-source feed
  2. Controllability-weighted departure
  3. Integrity gate
  4. Signed cleared value
  5. Settle on every venue
Escrow: release, adjust or void
after review

Review happens before money moves. A suspect value never reaches any venue, so nothing has to be clawed back.

Regulatory solution

One regulatory objective. Four supporting capabilities.

WICS moves manipulation-susceptibility controls from post hoc to ex ante. Integrity is measured before a contract is listed and monitored throughout its life, and the responses to specified integrity conditions are defined in advance. WICS combines quantitative assessment, predetermined controls, data-integrity protocols and configurable financial adjustment mechanisms within a single methodology.

The objective · CFTC Core Principle 3

Listed contracts that are not readily susceptible to manipulation.

WICS provides a documented methodology for product design, risk assessment, surveillance, and settlement governance, supporting exchanges' efforts to meet applicable CFTC core principles.

Supported by

01

Quantification

Measures susceptibility to manipulation, controllability, and anomalous activity using weighted integrity scores and coefficients.

02

Transparency

Establishes predefined thresholds, methodologies, and adjustment mechanisms before contracts are traded, so controls are ex ante rather than post hoc.

03

Settlement Integrity & Graduated Adjustments

Validates reference values and enables graduated adjustments to index values and financial settlement amounts rather than relying exclusively on binary accept-or-cancel decisions.

04

Product Innovation

Turns integrity analysis into better contract design, so exchanges can list new event-driven products with susceptibility controls built in from the start rather than added after problems arise.

Measure

Evaluate susceptibility to manipulation, external influence, anomalous activity and weaknesses in underlying data.

Quantify

Convert integrity characteristics into measurable scores, coefficients and weighted assessments.

Control

Define objective thresholds, validation requirements and predetermined responses.

Monitor

Evaluate observations against established integrity parameters.

Adjust

Where contract terms provide, apply predefined, graduated adjustments to values or settlement.

Measure · Quantify · Control · Validate · Settle

Market integrity & regulatory applications

Supporting product governance and regulatory documentation.

WICS is a proprietary quantitative integrity-control framework designed to help financial exchanges evaluate, demonstrate, and manage compliance with regulatory requirements that listed contracts not be readily susceptible to manipulation, while integrating predetermined integrity controls into financial product design, valuation, and settlement.

In the United States, the CFTC oversees designated contract markets and other derivatives-market participants under the Commodity Exchange Act. WICS supports the systematic assessment and documentation of integrity risks relevant to those responsibilities.

Product design & evaluation

Assess underlying events, variables and reference values before new products are introduced.

Susceptibility to manipulation

Document the factors associated with a product's potential vulnerability to manipulation or influence.

Market integrity controls

Identify where predetermined safeguards and validation requirements can be built in.

Product governance

A structured methodology for internal product reviews and documented assessments.

Contract specifications

Clear measurement methods, reference-data requirements and predefined provisions.

Participant transparency

Communicate how measurement and settlement methodologies work before contracts are entered.

Evidences Core Principles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 12 for every sports contract a DCM self-certifies.

The core principles most relevant to event contracts, and the contract-specific evidence WICS produces for each.

CP 2

Enforce trading rules and contract terms

  • Orders are checked against an insider registry before acceptance, with limits scaled to proximity to the event.
  • Every check is timestamped as evidence for enforcement.
CP 3

List only contracts not readily susceptible to manipulation

Primary objective
  • Each input is scored for how easily a few actors could influence it, and the index reflects that score.
  • Settlement uses a designated source, verified against a second, signed and logged.
CP 4

Prevent manipulation, price distortion and settlement disruption

  • Real-time triggers withhold an input before payment when prices diverge, sources disagree or high-risk results look anomalous.
  • Holds are released or voided under published rules and reach every linked product.
CP 5

Set contract-specific position limits or accountability

Risk-based position controls
  • Limits are calibrated to the susceptibility of the event or metric, not set flat: tighter where a few actors can sway the result, with enhanced restrictions for insiders and anyone with direct control.
CP 12

Protect participants; promote fair trading

Protection from compromised settlement
  • Trading halts around material information until it is officially published.
  • Every operator settles on the same signed value, so no one is paid on a manipulated result.

Core Principles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 12 are CEA section 5(d)(2), (3), (4), (5) and (12). Rulemaking is still open. Source: CFTC Staff Advisory 26-08, DCMs and Event Contracts (12 Mar 2026); CFTC Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on prediction markets (Mar 2026).

Regulatory relevance

Core Principle 3 is the primary objective WICS is designed to support. Its analysis and documentation may also be relevant to Core Principles 2, 4, 5 and 12: rule enforcement, market-disruption prevention, position limits or accountability, and participant protection.

Depending on the product, WICS analyses may inform internal reviews associated with CFTC Part 40 product-submission procedures.

Important limits

WICS is not a regulatory approval mechanism. Its use does not establish that a contract complies with applicable law, eliminate susceptibility to manipulation, or replace required regulatory assessments.

WICS cannot make an otherwise impermissibly manipulable contract eligible for listing simply by applying an adjustment.

The WICS methodology

Four complementary components.

Each component can be used on its own or combined according to the characteristics of the underlying product. Factors, weightings, calibration and adjustment schedules are proprietary and are shared only in confidential commercial discussions.

S-Score

Sustainability Score

Assessing the integrity characteristics of financial products

A proprietary assessment of whether an event, variable, index or product can support reliable measurement and settlement, applied before an instrument is introduced.

In WICS, "sustainability" means the durability and reliability of a product's integrity characteristics, not environmental sustainability.

C-Score

Controllability Coefficient

Quantifying susceptibility to external influence

Some events are substantially independent of market participants; others can be affected by parties with an economic interest. The Controllability Coefficient is a proprietary measure of that distinction.

Usable as an independent risk indicator or combined with other WICS metrics.

Gates

Integrity Gates

Predetermined conditions for additional controls

Predefined conditions that distinguish ordinary fluctuation from conditions warranting a specified response, from further review to a predetermined adjustment.

Not every gate requires a financial adjustment; some serve only assessment, monitoring or validation.

GIA

Graduated Integrity Adjustment

Proportional responses to defined integrity conditions

A configurable mechanism that applies predetermined, proportional adjustments when qualifying conditions occur, bridging integrity measurement and financial settlement.

PredeterminationRules and calculations set before the event.
ProportionalityAdjustments scale with the defined severity.
TransparencyCalculations and consequences are documented and reviewable.

What makes WICS different · The WICS value chain

Not simply detection. An integrated path from measurement to settlement.

Identifying unusual behavior and deciding how it should affect a financial contract are separate challenges. WICS connects them through predetermined methodologies, making it valuable both as a product-development methodology and as a financial settlement-control framework.

  1. 01

    Product assessment

    The underlying event or variable is evaluated before listing.

  2. 02

    Integrity scoring

    Findings become weighted integrity scores.

  3. 03

    Controllability analysis

    The potential for interested parties to influence the outcome is measured.

  4. 04

    Predetermined controls

    Integrity gates and responses are defined and disclosed in advance.

  5. 05

    Data validation

    Observations are checked against the established requirements.

  6. 06

    Financial settlement

    Settlement reflects rules everyone knew in advance, with graduated adjustments where provided.

Beyond traditional surveillance

Surveillance focuses on improper trading and market abnormalities. WICS extends the focus to the underlying events and variables themselves: their controllability, data independence and measurement reliability.

It is designed to complement established surveillance and compliance systems, not replace them.

Beyond binary decisions

When exceptional circumstances arise, remedies are often limited to accepting, rejecting or canceling. WICS adds graduated integrity adjustments, so that where contract terms permit, a reference value or obligation can be modified proportionally.

Predetermined, not discretionary

Integrity rules and adjustment parameters are established before an event occurs, emphasizing consistency, documentation and advance disclosure.

Participants can evaluate the consequences of specified integrity conditions before taking on exposure.

How WICS works

A structured process from product design to settlement.

  1. 1

    Design

    Define the underlying variable and assess its integrity characteristics before the product is introduced.

  2. 2

    Calibrate

    Apply WICS scoring and establish the product's predetermined integrity controls.

  3. 3

    Monitor

    Evaluate observations and reported outcomes against those controls as the contract runs.

  4. 4

    Settle & document

    Apply any predetermined response, calculate the applicable value and keep an auditable record.

Graduated settlement methodology

A more granular approach to integrity-related adjustments.

Consider a hypothetical contract that settles on the movement of an underlying index. Rather than accepting the entire unadjusted movement or canceling the contract, a predefined methodology produces a graduated financial result.

Integrity-related adjustments can be established as mathematical components of a financial product, rather than determined exclusively after an anomalous event.

Hypothetical example

Illustrative only
Unadjusted index movement10 points
Contractual value per point$100
Qualifying integrity conditionTriggered
Predetermined adjustment factor50%
Adjusted index movement5 points
Without WICS $1,000 full movement accepted, or the contract is canceled
With WICS $500 graduated result under a previously disclosed factor

Actual adjustment schedules, calculations and settlement consequences depend on the applicable product methodology and contractual terms. The example does not suggest that any particular adjustment would be permissible for every regulated financial instrument.

Flexible implementation

Designed for different products and operating models.

Not every product requires the same controls. Financial adjustments are an optional application, not a mandatory feature.

Assessment-only

Evaluate a product's integrity without changing its valuation or settlement.

Monitoring

Apply predetermined metrics and thresholds to observe qualifying changes.

Data validation

Review and validate underlying measurements and reference values.

Contract design

Build integrity considerations into specifications and calculations.

Settlement-integrated

Apply contractually authorized adjustments when conditions occur.

Applications & engagement

One framework. Multiple applications. Flexible ways to engage.

Just as financial products incorporate pricing models, volatility assumptions and reference-data methodologies, WICS establishes integrity as a measurable financial input. Because it focuses on an underlying variable, its integrity characteristics and its financial consequences, it is not limited to prediction markets, binary contracts or exchange-traded instruments.

01Where WICS applies

Prediction markets & event contracts

Separating independently verified events from those dependent on discretionary conduct or concentrated information.

Exchanges & trading venues

Quantitative product assessments and a shared language for product, risk, surveillance and compliance teams.

Derivatives & structured products

Swaps, futures, options, collars and bilateral contracts referencing measurable variables.

Financial indices & reference data

Documented validation, with separate unadjusted and adjusted values for auditability.

Weather & environmental derivatives

Validation conditions and fallback methods for observations affected by equipment failure or inconsistent sources.

Sports-related event contracts

Reliability, controllability and verifiability of game outcomes and statistics. WICS does not itself determine whether a contract is permissible.

Insurance & parametric products

Data assessment, threshold structures and predetermined calculations for measured triggers.

Clearing & settlement infrastructure

Reference-data integrity and predetermined settlement methodologies for clearing organizations.

02How to engage

Featured offering

Integrity-as-a-Service

Regularly updated susceptibility scores, controllability assessments, threshold monitoring, anomaly indicators and supporting reports, without building the infrastructure in-house.

Subscription or usage-basedDiscuss Integrity-as-a-Service

Enterprise methodology licensing

WICS scoring, product-assessment, threshold and graduated-adjustment methodologies for internal product-development and risk processes.

Enterprise, product-specific or institutional licenses

Settlement & reference-data services

Independently verified reference values, integrity status indicators and predefined settlement notifications that multiple products can reference.

Data subscriptions, API or per-product

Product development & structuring

Evaluation of proposed event contracts, susceptibility analysis, redesign of higher-risk structures and design of graduated settlement provisions.

Engagements and partnerships

Technology & infrastructure integration

Selected WICS calculations and controls built into existing exchange, data, surveillance and settlement platforms.

Technology licensing and support

Strategic partnerships

Collaboration with exchanges, technology providers, data providers and research organizations on new applications.

Negotiated arrangements

Not sure where to start?

Most institutions begin with a stand-alone product assessment. Tell us about the contract you are designing.

Contact WICS →

03A phased path to adoption

Institutions can begin with stand-alone product assessment, with no integration into live settlement systems, and expand from there.

  1. 1

    Product assessment

    Screening, quantitative scoring and supporting documentation.

  2. 2

    Pilot programs

    Controlled pilots of assessments, data validation, integrity gates and reporting.

  3. 3

    Technology integration

    Automated scoring, configurable thresholds and integrity notifications.

  4. 4

    Settlement integration

    Selected applications in settlement calculations, subject to testing, legal review and regulatory requirements.

  5. 5

    Enterprise scale

    Enterprise licensing, recurring data services and integration partnerships.

Integrity as shared financial infrastructure

One verified reference value. Multiple financial applications.

Markets often support many instruments that reference the same underlying event, measurement or index. WICS performs integrity assessment and reference-data validation at the level of the underlying measurement, so each authorized product can rely on a common verified value while keeping its own terms, payoffs and settlement periods.

Underlying measurement

WICS-verified reference value

Integrity assessed and data validated once, at the source.

  • Futures contract
  • Option
  • Bilateral swap
  • Structured hedge
  • Performance-linked agreement
  • Sponsorship agreement
  • Insurance-linked payment
  • Binary event contract
ScalabilityOne integrity methodology can support many instruments.
ConsistencyInstitutions reference common validation standards.
EfficiencyEstablished reference-data and integrity components can be reused.
TransparencyParticipants can evaluate documented measurement and validation methods.
InteroperabilityCommon integrity outputs can serve multiple platforms.
FlexibilityLicense individual components or integrated capabilities.

Public-interest factors

Names a commercial hedger and publishes economically useful information.

How WICS products answer two public-interest factors in the CFTC's June 2026 proposed rule on event contracts.1

Factor: potential to hedge or price (a “significant factor”)

Named hedgers for each product

  • Sponsors with collared hedges
  • Airlines and hotels shorting the TSA index
  • Shippers on port volume
  • Utilities on weather counts

Most event contracts can't name a commercial hedger.

Factor: economically useful information

The proposal's own example is a team index

The proposal cites a sports team's effect on local hotels and restaurants.

A cleared, published departure index shows whether the team is beating its own history, which predicts attendance and spending better than one game's result.

WICS products are designed to meet the public-interest factors on top of the manipulation test.

1. Source: CFTC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking amending Regulation 40.11 and adding Appendix F to Part 40, event contracts (10 Jun 2026). Proposal is not final and may change.

Why it matters

WICS enables product innovation through measurable integrity.

For exchanges, clearing organizations, product developers and market participants, WICS helps address integrity considerations before they become unexpected operational or settlement issues.

  • Reduces settlement uncertaintyPredetermined adjustment methodologies give advance clarity on how specified conditions are treated.
  • Enhances market integrityMeasurable risk controls are incorporated into product design from the start.
  • Supports product innovationTools to evaluate integrity risks reveal weaknesses and better contract designs.
  • Improves regulatory defensibilityDocumented, objective and transparent methodologies explain how integrity was assessed.
  • Differentiates riskDifferent products present different vulnerabilities; WICS evaluates them rather than treating all variables alike.
  • Strengthens auditabilityDocumented calculations, reference data and thresholds create a clear record of outcomes.
  • Builds participant confidenceParticipants know how qualifying anomalies will affect financial outcomes before trading begins.

The framework supports integrity management but does not eliminate manipulation risk or override applicable regulatory requirements.

Value across the product lifecycle

One methodology, relevant at every stage.

  1. Development

    Evaluate underlying integrity characteristics.

  2. Risk management

    Quantitative measurements and defined thresholds.

  3. Monitoring

    Data validation and integrity notifications.

  4. Settlement

    Predetermined methods for specified conditions.

  5. Governance

    Documented assessments and calculation records.

Financial exchangesIntegrity assessment, product design and predefined contractual controls.
Prediction-market operatorsEvent-specific controllability, data reliability and measurement risk.
Clearing organizationsReference-data integrity and settlement methodologies.
Product developersIntegrity assessment built into new instruments.
Quantitative researchWeighted concepts for measuring and comparing integrity.
Surveillance teamsProduct-level indicators that complement monitoring.
Compliance & riskDocumented vulnerabilities and proposed controls.
Fintech providersIntegration of integrity analysis and validation protocols.
Index administratorsData reliability and transparent reference values.
Hedgers & participantsTools to evaluate the integrity of underlying variables.

The value of product redesign

Turning integrity analysis into better financial products.

When a proposed contract presents elevated manipulation or settlement risk, the choice need not be limited to accepting the original design or abandoning the idea. WICS provides a quantitative basis for evaluating alternative structures that preserve useful economic exposure while improving integrity characteristics.

The objective is not simply to identify problematic contracts. It is to support the development of better-designed ones.

Change the underlying measurementCombine independent variablesReduce reliance on a single controllable eventStrengthen data validationRevise settlement provisions
Original design

A single action controlled by one individual

Concentrated control and a single point of failure for settlement.

Redesigned

A diversified index of independently verifiable observations

Similar economic exposure, with integrity risk spread across many sources.

Bars illustrate relative manipulation susceptibility, conceptually. A redesigned product still requires independent legal, regulatory and risk assessment.

WICS Leadership

A longstanding history of innovation.

Vision

Advance financial products through systematic integrity measurement, transparent methodologies and predetermined controls.

Mission

Provide a flexible framework for evaluating integrity risk, strengthening reference data and defining contractual outcomes.

Approach

Quantitative discipline, transparency, documentation and adaptability to each market and product.

  • Created the NORDIX weather indexThe Normal Departure Index. Its methodology was used to trade more than $20 billion in notional value of bilateral contracts, and its contracts were listed at the U.S. Futures Exchange, later the basis for a listed wind-variability futures contract.
  • Structured products built on NORDIXBasis of innovative financial products, including catastrophe bonds, weather derivatives, and cross-asset swaps, leveraging proprietary index methodologies to manage financial, commodity, and operational risks across the energy, agriculture, recreation, and broader commercial sectors.
  • Energy-correlated swapsStructured innovative and energy-correlated, multi-year Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) swaps and hydroelectricity swaps using the proprietary NORDIX methodology, monetizing future renewable energy revenues associated with electricity generation to facilitate solar and hydroelectric project financing, optimize cash flows, and mitigate long-term revenue risk.
  • ESG sustainability index methodologyDeveloped a proprietary Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) sustainability index methodology that quantifies corporate sustainability performance by measuring environmental and social contributions relative to resource consumption and governance factors. The intellectual-property-based methodology translates these measurements into standardized financial index values designed to support tradable indices, derivatives, swaps, and structured financial products.
  • Commodity Futures Modernization ActServed on CFTC committees in 1999 in connection with the CFMA. Contributed to derivatives market modernization initiatives addressing emerging exchange structures, manipulation susceptibility, market integrity standards, and the development of principles-based regulatory frameworks supporting financial product innovation.
  • Weather Board of TradeRegistered the Weather Board of Trade as the first-ever registered exempt board of trade.
  • CFTC Technology Advisory Committee (TAC)Advised and contributed to the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act by identifying emerging regulatory challenges and providing recommendations on derivatives market structure, technological innovation, and market integrity to inform regulatory rulemaking.

White papers

Research & White Papers

Explore WICS research and industry white papers examining emerging regulatory challenges, market integrity, susceptibility to manipulation, derivatives innovation, and evolving financial market structures. Our publications analyze current legal and regulatory developments and present innovative approaches to strengthening financial product design, transparency, and market resilience.

Register once to download any WICS white paper.

Regulatory & legal analysisOctober 2026 · 15 pages

The Market-Integrity Gap

Divided Courts, an Expanding CFTC Record, and the Missing Contract-Level Integrity Test

The circuit split over sports event contracts, the CFTC’s 2025–2026 record, enforcement and integrity evidence, and the gaps that remain under Core Principles 3 and 4, followed by a proposed response.

Download white paper
FrameworkOctober 2026 · 9 pages

A Measurable Integrity Layer for Event-Driven Financial Products

Quantitative screening, objective triggers and rule-based settlement controls

How WICS scores and screens contracts before listing, monitors designated signals during a contract’s life, and applies predefined settlement controls, with illustrative economics and governance safeguards.

Download white paper

Frequently asked questions

Understanding WICS.

What is WICS?

WICS stands for Weighted Integrity Control Systems. It is a proprietary framework for evaluating the integrity characteristics of measurable events, underlying variables, reference values and financial contracts, integrating weighted scoring, controllability assessment, predetermined thresholds, data-validation protocols and configurable financial adjustment mechanisms.

What problem does WICS solve?

It addresses how to measure, document and manage integrity risks in products whose values depend on potentially manipulable, anomalous or unreliable information, and how specified integrity conditions should affect financial calculations and settlements.

Is WICS a market surveillance system?

Not primarily. WICS is built around the integrity of underlying events, measurements and reference values. It can complement surveillance systems with tools for product assessment, data validation and predetermined contractual controls.

Is WICS limited to prediction markets?

No. WICS is product-agnostic, with potential applications in derivatives, indices, reference-data methodologies, insurance-linked and weather instruments, structured contracts and other measurable financial products.

What are the Sustainability Score and Controllability Coefficient?

The Sustainability Score evaluates the reliability, durability and integrity of an underlying product or variable. The Controllability Coefficient evaluates the ability of individuals, organizations or other actors to influence an underlying event or measurement. Both can feed a weighted integrity assessment.

What is an integrity gate?

A predetermined condition that triggers a specified response when defined requirements are met, such as validation, further review, escalation or an authorized contractual calculation.

Does WICS automatically cancel contracts?

No. Depending on the product and its rules, WICS may support assessment, monitoring, validation or predetermined adjustments. Any cancellation or other consequence depends on the governing product terms.

Does WICS establish whether manipulation occurred?

Not necessarily. A score or triggered threshold does not by itself establish that anyone manipulated a market or event. A determination of unlawful manipulation is a separate legal and evidentiary matter.

Can WICS prevent manipulation?

WICS helps identify and manage specified vulnerabilities but cannot guarantee manipulation will not occur. Its value lies in structured assessment, transparency, defined controls and the financial treatment of qualifying conditions.

Can WICS be used without adjusting settlement values?

Yes. WICS can be used independently for product assessment, monitoring, documentation or data validation. Financial adjustments are optional.

Does WICS guarantee regulatory approval?

No. WICS is an analytical and product-design methodology. Its use does not guarantee regulatory acceptance, product eligibility or compliance with applicable law, and it does not replace legal analysis or compliance obligations.

Is WICS intended to replace existing exchange controls?

No. It is designed to complement existing governance, risk management, surveillance and compliance frameworks with additional quantitative tools and predetermined methodologies.

Integrity by design

Integrity is more than a regulatory requirement. It is a financial product design consideration.

Financial markets depend on confidence in the information, measurements and methodologies that determine contractual values. WICS connects quantitative assessment, weighted scoring, integrity gates, data validation and predetermined financial controls across the entire product lifecycle.

Explore the potential of quantitative integrity controls.

WICS welcomes discussions with exchanges, financial institutions, technology providers, product developers and other organizations interested in measurable integrity controls and financial product innovation.

Financial product designPrediction-market integrityQuantitative methodologyReference-data validationSettlement methodologiesProprietary indicesProduct governanceStrategic partnershipsTechnology integrationLicensing

Quantifying Integrity · Strengthening Markets · Enabling Innovation